On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500
>Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
>
>> That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic
>> release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic
>> live image that will have anaconda on it for live installs.
>
>Is there a bug? I'm not sure how that happened from this change...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224561
Ah, nifty. ;(
>> I think the idea was to have product (edition) dependent
presets,
>> but I don't think the implementation was done well.
>
>No, the idea was to move presets from systemd that didn't want to
>have to change them to fedora-release that makes more sense and is
>controlled by more Fedoray folks who can make changes as needed.
fedora-release seems to be getting more complicated. This makes it
hard for generic-release to stay caught up as a separate package. I
would like to see generic-release merged into the fedora-release
source rpm so that it is easier to keep in sync, if that is possible
to do while still solving the trademark problem it is meant to solve.
I'm not sure it is, but hopefully we can come up with something.
Perhaps a easier way to merge changes from the fedora->generic one or
something.
kevin