Dave Jones wrote:
Yeah, despite how it might seem, I'm not really 'back to
work' yet :)
Understood ...
Hopefully one of my testboxes at the office will be able to trigger
it.
On the machine where I originally reported the oops using i386, I though
I'd try today's x86_64 version, it appears to have the same issue, I've
added a screenshot to BZ#176448