On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kamil Paral <kparal@redhat.com> wrote:

That's the question though - is it required? I thought the test case would be marked as optional. We already require FMW in "Default boot and install" matrix, so Fedora is covered (we just don't know *what* Fedora they used for that). And are any FMW crashes on Win/macOS blocking? I don't think we have a criterion for that (the question is whether we should).

So as long as we keep that table optional, I think it's useful to split out the Fedora version, so that we clearly see what people tried and what they didn't. Also, for the same reason it would probably help to see Windows 7 and Windows 10 separated.

But if we want to mark it as required, I wouldn't want yet another exploded matrix, and I agree Fedora 26 could be left out (and Windows merged together).

I figured it wouldn't hurt if I add the table marked as optional:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AInstallation_test_matrix&diff=491515&oldid=491270

We can now continue discussing how we want it to look like, but at least it's there already.

As a footnote, I hardcoded Fedora 24/25/26 numbers, because I wasn't sure how to do that better. I can use a template, but I don't want the numbers to change once it is converted to a standard install matrix, and I'm not sure what method relval uses to do so. (So this is mainly a question for Adam, whether we can use templates in there or not).