On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 17:17, Steve Bergman wrote:
But I disagree that it should be sprung upon them
with no warning or transition period.)
This has been talked about on the fedora lists a number of times
over the past few months.
13. Form the basis of Red Hat's commercially supported operating
system
products.
(I would call this a suggestion of compatibility. True, it doesn't
actually say so in so many words, but it implies it. So if
compatibility is not really a goal, this is all the more reason to state
it clearly as a nonobjective.)
A corporate mix of RHEL servers and FC desktops seems like a very
obvious and attractive combo. So FC's stance on compatibility is likely
to generate either a lot of joy or a lot of tears, depending.
As already stated several times today in this thread, RHEL 3 supports IPSEC.
Dave