Aurelien Bompard wrote:
>Indeed, XFree86-Mesa-libGL should be removed with
'--nodeps'. Yes, the
>dependency game here is not so nice. I have thought the best way to go
>if Mr Harris issued an XFree86 update for Fedora or an application
>depended on the lib... Would be to install it again go back to the 'nv'
>driver, do what you have todo, remove XFree86-Mesa-libGL again and
>re-install the binary 'nvidia' driver once more. A real pain no doubt,
>but as clean as least troublesome as it's probably gonna get. :/
What could also be done, is using a virtual package which would provide
libGL.so. How about the rpm created by this spec file :
I already sent a similar message in October. See
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2003-October/msg03252.html
Could this be a cleaner solution ?
Definitely.
--
Sjoerd Mullender <sjoerd(a)acm.org>