Andrew Farris wrote:
> Anaconda is smart enough to create labels which do not conflict
with
> already existing ones. At least this was the case when I was adding
> new installations on the same machine. I could redo later these
> labels to be consistent across a particular installation but this is
> only for my own sanity. I may have five or six distros, between
> Fedora and CentOS and x86_64 and i386, on my test box at a given
> moment.
I was not aware anaconda was now doing this correctly, that certainly
would be an improvement over the last time I tried multiple physical
installations.
I was wondering why I didn't actually recall name collisions when I was
testing FC6, RHEL5 (twice) and some others on one system. I'd put it
down to an approaching new decade.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa(a)coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa(a)coco.merseine.nu
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)