Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:31:04PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
>Isn't this typically the type of module that would go into the
>"kernel-unsupported" sub-package? I'd be very happy to be able to run
>at my own risk, being able to do it easily, and keeping a default Red Hat
Nothing in RHL is supported really, so it's unclear that
supported/unsupported is a useful distinction.
er - what's all this about up2date and rhn then? seems like support to me.