tir, 01.02.2005 kl. 17.52 skrev Rodolfo J. Paiz:
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 15:52 -0500, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
> Better to pick one of 1) ship an almost-final beta and issue an update
> to 2.0 when it's released, 2) ship 1.1.x and resign ourselves to that
> being the version eternally paired with FC4, 3) delay the release of FC4
> in the hopes that OOo 2.0 will be shipped so as to not cause a
> significant delay.
> Personally, I'm somewhat partial to delay FC4, but only if the delay
> is, as some one else has suggested, less than 30 days.
I know I've already said this (in fact, I was the one who suggested <30
days as a good decision point for delaying FC4), but:
1. If <30 days, delay FC4.
2. If not, then ship the almost-final beta with FC4 and update to
final when it's ready.
Please...
Or provide "openoffice2.org-2.0.i386.rpm" that conflicts
openoffice.org
in extras?