TK009 said the following on 03/06/2009 08:10 AM Pacific Time:
> John Poelstra wrote:
>> TK009 wrote:
>>> My understanding has been that yes you can triage components that
>>> someone else has chosen. For greatest triage impact it would be
>>> best to choose components not already chosen, however, triage
>>> components you feel most comfortable with.
>>>
>>> This may change after the meeting Tuesday. I believe this is the
>>> correct answer for now though. I know you've asked this question a
>>> number of times now and not really received an answer.
>>>
>>
>> I changed the admonition on the joining page.
>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Joining#How_to_Sign_Up
>>
>> Is that better?
>>
>> John
>>
> I think it was the conflicting wording
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/ActiveTriagers
> the note above the components list says:
> "*It is okay for more than one person to cover the same component"
> *
> while
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Joining#How_to_Sign_Up says:
> *"If you are unfamiliar with a component and someone is very active
> there, it is probably a good idea to pick a different component or
> talk to that person and see if you can work together."
>
> *TK009*
> *
>
How about if we remove "*It is okay for more than one person to cover
the same component" for now ?
John
We need to remove one of them for sure. I see no issue with removing
"*It is okay for more than one person to cover the same component". I
have one question though, does the *"If you are unfamiliar with a
component and someone is very active there, it is probably a good idea
to pick a different component or talk to that person and see if you can
work together." fit best where it is or would it better in place of the
"*It is okay for more than one person to cover the same component"?