On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:06 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> And it's also just semantically wrong - the word 'assigned'
> does not mean 'triaged'.
It can also be a bit annoying when there are multiple maintainers for a
package, and it gets "assigned" to the main maintainer. Personally I'd
prefer e.g. renaming "new" to "unconfirmed", and "assigned"
That doesn't work either, though, for the same objection - it's not
'confirmed', it's triaged. We don't require reproduction as part of the
I think the only sensible way to rename the states would be NEW and
TRIAGED, but I'd rather have a keyword for Triaged than have it be a
Whether or not an additional state of "assigned" is then
necessary is fair moot to me. I'd prefer to avoid flag-city with an
explosion of possible flag-combinations, and have a simple state
Yep, me too.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org