On 08/08/15 05:42, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:22:56AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> What I *can't* find is any reference for the justification usually
> cited for the criterion. Several times we mention that there was an
> actual case where people downloaded an Alpha or Beta then got confused
> because the background was the same as the previous stable release, but
> I've been searching for 15 mins and can't find it. This is probably
> just because it's a difficult thing to search for, though.
>
> It's worth noting that we used to use considerably more 'striking'
> desktop backgrounds than we currently do; the last few releases have
> all been fairly subtle variations on the theme of 'abstract shapes in
> Fedora blue', really.
Here's a thought: maybe the Fedora background logo GNOME Shell plugin
could detect if running on an Alpha/Beta release (or on Rawhide) and
change appropriately?
Some us fled from GNOME, when GNOME 3 was unleashed!
I now use Mate, and avoid GNOME as much as is practicable.
Cheers,
Gavin