test September 2024

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

15 participants
30 discussions

Re: Kernel 6.11 Test Week 2024-09-29 to 2024-10-05
by Sumantro Mukherjee 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 10:51 AM Zerotwo02 <vaishnavyo12345(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Good day, are these tests only concerned with systems running Fedora 40 > and 39? Or is there any testing needed to be done by systems running on > Fedora 41? > Regards > Vaishnav R > > The testday iso is https://jforbes.fedorapeople.org/testweek/kerneltest-6.11.1.iso (which is F40) . The test week will benefit all reports of F40 and F39. For F41, please install this rpm https://jforbes.fedorapeople.org/testweek/kernel-tests-20240322-1.fc41.noar… .

1 0

Kernel 6.11 Test Week 2024-09-29 to 2024-10-05
by Sumantro Mukherjee 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

Hey All, I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.11 Test week is happening from 2024-09-29 to 2024-10-05. It's fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your results. As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-day(a)libera.chat for questions and discussion. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-09-29_Kernel_6.11_Test_Week https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/197 -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED <https://redhat.com/trusted>

1 0

2024-09-30 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 41 Blocker Review Meeting
by Adam Williamson 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

# F10 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2024-09-30 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.… Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 1 proposed blocker and 2 proposed freeze exceptions for Final. Here is a handy link which should show you the meeting time in your local time: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Fedora+41+Blocker… The meeting will be on Matrix. Click the link above to join in a web client - you can authenticate with your FAS account - or use a dedicated client of your choosing. If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions. Those links take you to tickets where you can vote. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!** We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F40 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good weekend and see you on Monday! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

2024-09-30 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora Quality Meeting
by Adam Williamson 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2024-09-30 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=cha… Greetings testers! It's meeting time again. Here is a handy link which should show you the meeting time in your local time: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Fedora+quality+me… If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this email and suggest them! Thanks. == Proposed Agenda Topics == 1. Previous meeting follow-up 2. Fedora 41 status 3. Test Day / community event status 4. Open floor -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

ABRT - Server says: 400 Bad Request
by lejeczek 27 Sep '24

27 Sep '24

Hi guys. I've submitted a bug and it's been a while with no comments, so I hope - perhaps devel checks herel - here I'll get more luck/feedback. I run ABRT and every time it fails to file a BZ, fails with: ... Bug search failed. Server says: 400 Bad Request Creating a new bug... Failed to create bug. Server says: 400 Bad Request {"message":"You have attempted to access the API either using an unsupported method or using one or more unsupported parameters. You must use the 'Authorization' header to authenticate to the API and you must remove all unsupported parameters from the query. The unsupported parameters are: Bugzilla_login, Bugzilla_password, Bugzilla_token, Bugzilla_api_key. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/docs/en/html/api/core/v1/general.html#authentic… for details on using the 'Authorization' header.","documentation":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/docs/en/html/api/index.html","error":true,"code":32000} ('report_Bugzilla' exited with 1) I think - if remember correctly - this appeared first after update to latest/current rpms, prior to that Bugzilla part of ABRT did work. Any & all thoughts share are much appreciated. thanks, L.

2 2

mingw-w64 support for MSVCRT in F41
by Ron Yorston 24 Sep '24

24 Sep '24

I've tried using the mingw-w64 toolchain to build a Windows application on Fedora 41. Following my usual practice I installed mingw64-gcc and used the x86_64-w64-mingw32 toolchain to cross-compile. I was disappointed to find that the resulting binary required UCRT. In fact, apart from timestamps, the x86_64-w64-mingw32 toolchain generated exactly the same binary as x86_64-w64-mingw32ucrt. I realise that mingw-w64 now has UCRT as the default, but I had expected the x86_64-w64-mingw32 toolchain to be built with the right configuration to support MSVCRT. Or am I doing something wrong? Do I need to change my procedure somehow? Cheers, Ron

1 1

Self-introduction thephatle
by Marko Jokinen 24 Sep '24

24 Sep '24

hello i am thephatle real name Marko Jokinen Retired Head Chef currently co-founder and CTO on International Tourism company. Originally From scandinavia living in Asia but soon Moving back to Scandinavia for longer residence and still will be living in 2 countries. Timezones Asia UTC+7 Scandinavia UTC+3. i have been wanting to join Fedora contributing for year now, but i guess i am still sufferring imposter syndrome and not feeling i am ready or my skills are good enough to be art of the Contributing part. Alwas been testing new tech or Softwares started long time ago on Windows when insider came i joined on it and started to run Windows insider builds and man others IOS beta, Android Beta builds. Passion has always been on QA side and testing things since i like test and try to fix when i brake them and i just like build system from start. What i can do well i like learning alot and i am Creative Developer/3D developer ( Three.js/WebGL/blender ) still learning when i have time. Have studied IT support and got nice little Certification From Google for IT support Specialist. Second i really like security and immutable systems with cyber security and ethical hacking so now i am Doing my First C|EH certificate on ethical hacking and Google Cyber Security Specialist. On side still learning C# and Python and sometimes refreshing html,css,sass, react and javascript when i start some website project or updating someting sorry for long mail, but i want to join QA team and start on small scale to slowly get to more knowledge to go more demanding stuff Bugzilla account : thephatle(a)proton.me Fedora User name : thephatle Matrix : thepahtle Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) secure email.

2 2

Fedora 41 app launch issues
by Blake Gardner 24 Sep '24

24 Sep '24

Hello, I tried upgrading my existing system and then later a fresh install of Fedora 41 Beta. The problem I am seeing is that after login, if I try to launch a new GTK app like Files, it takes forever to open. If I try to launch a GTK app too soon after logging in, the app does not follow my dark mode setting. Here is a URL to a video demonstrating the issue. CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X (16) @ 4.66 GHz GPU: AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT [Discrete] https://youtu.be/jRlBsWRnGDw On a hunch, I upgraded my system to Rawhide and the problem is completely gone and everything is snappy. -- Blake Gardner

2 4

Missing icons in F41
by Ron Yorston 23 Sep '24

23 Sep '24

Using GNOME Shell on Wayland in Fedora 41 with Hicolor icons: - GNOME Terminal displays the 'missing icon' icon instead of '+' and '-'. Using GNOME Shell Classic on Wayland in Fedora 41 with either Hicolor or Adwaita icons: - Icecat has the 'unknown app' icon in the Window List. (Actually, I don't think this is new in F41.) Cheers, Ron

1 0

Nvidia Driver and UEFI
by Thomas Gruber 21 Sep '24

21 Sep '24

Work in my case with version 41 gnome

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test September 2024