test May 2012

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

121 participants
334 discussions

[Fedora QA] #284: Create advisory installation validation test cases for VirtualBox
by fedora-badges 03 Aug '12

03 Aug '12

#284: Create advisory installation validation test cases for VirtualBox ----------------------+------------------ Reporter: adamwill | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------ Although kernel team (and the rest of the development team) specifically don't want to commit to supporting VirtualBox, the practical fact is that a lot of people like to run Fedora in VirtualBox, and we don't at present have formal testing in place to find out if it's actually working during release validation. In practice, we usually find out about any bugs via people trying it and then posting their results to test@ or the forums, but this is pretty rough and ready and it's easy to lose the information. If we add formal VBox testing to the release validation process we'll probably find out about VBox fails sooner and do a better job of tracking them for possible fixes or at least documentation at release time. So, ideally, we should write test cases for deploying Fedora as a VBox guest (and possibly using it as a VBox host), and add these to the installation validation matrix as 'advisory' tests (tests not associated with Alpha, Beta or Final release phases, and without a corresponding release criterion). Dan Mashal, who I hope I've added to CC, is interested in this topic and may choose to be an awesome rock star and contribute the test cases :) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/284> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 12

[Fedora QA] #180: Create Package Specific Test Cases for Design Suite
by fedora-badges 03 Aug '12

03 Aug '12

#180: Create Package Specific Test Cases for Design Suite ---------------------------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: sdz | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: design suite, package test plan | ---------------------------------------------+------------------------------ The Design Suite has been promoted at SXSW and other conferences. We want to make sure that the included applications are all working and in a good state. Adam introduced package specific test cases at FUDCon in Tempe. We should consider creating test cases for the most important tools, such as blender, gimp, inkscape and shotwell. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/180> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

[Fedora QA] #287: Add Bodhi testing guidelines to Bodhi?
by fedora-badges 03 Aug '12

03 Aug '12

#287: Add Bodhi testing guidelines to Bodhi? -------------------------+------------------ Reporter: kparal | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -------------------------+------------------ My thinking process: 1. I was about to test https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.9.3.997-0.7.fc17 2. I realized I don't know what karma to post when NM works in general, but I haven't tested the linked bug fixes 3. I know we have some karma guidelines somewhere on the wiki 4. I couldn't find the page 5. I found the page at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester#Feedback_procedures after some time 6. My use case doesn't seem to be mentioned anyway. But that's not important. The question is - shouldn't we link these instructions directly from the bodhi page? No one will find it otherwise. That wiki page is proven tester specific, but the "Feedback procedures" chapter is not. I think it would be really worth the effort to create a new wiki page containing just guidelines for correct karma posting and then ask Bodhi maintainers to link that page directly from the Bodhi page. I imagine it could be displayed besides the "Add a comment" text are, named something like "Karma posting guidelines". What do you think? Does anyone feel like volunteering for creating this separate wiki page? I'll gladly create a ticket for Bodhi afterwards. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/287> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

[Fedora QA] #235: request: add tests for new grub2 stage2 device types
by fedora-badges 03 Aug '12

03 Aug '12

#235: request: add tests for new grub2 stage2 device types -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: dlehman | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- = phenomenon = GRUB2 supports several new md raid levels (0,4,5,6,10) and also lvm logical volumes as the /boot device. It would be nice to get some testing coverage for this, including combinations like root on lvm (no separate /boot) w/ md raid pvs. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/235> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 3

[Fedora QA] #286: gnome-shell + soft rendering test day
by fedora-badges 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

#286: gnome-shell + soft rendering test day ----------------------+------------------ Reporter: vbenes | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------ please create a test day for software rendering to 2012-03-29 instead of gnome-boxes which will be moved to 04/19 thanks, Vladimir -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/286> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

[Fedora QA] #280: Request for F17 firewalld test day on 2012-03-15
by fedora-badges 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

#280: Request for F17 firewalld test day on 2012-03-15 -----------------------------------------+------------------ Reporter: twoerner | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------------------+------------------ I'd like to run a firewalld test day on 2012-03-15. firewalld is the new firewall solution in Fedora with network zones support. The tests should cover interaction with NetworkManager, libvirt and printer configuration/discovery. Maybe more tests are possible for other projects. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/280> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 6

Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
by Ed Greshko 17 Jun '12

17 Jun '12

On 04/26/2012 11:40 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > There was support added to the F17 kernel as well as the F17 nfs-utils, > namely the nfsidmap command which replaces the need for the > rpc.idmapd daemon. Thanks....

1 1

F17: gedit: drag & drop freezes forever mouse pointer on drag mode
by Pedro Francisco 14 Jun '12

14 Jun '12

I need to confirm a bug. Open one gedit window (MUST BE FROM GNOME-SHELL, either from ALT+F2 and 'gedit' or using the gnome-shell menus). On a command line do, for example: $ gedit ~/.bashrc _Another_ gedit window should open. To allow you to resume your work afterwards, on another console, do: $ sleep 15; killall gedit Try to drag and drop the ".bashrc" tab to the other gedit window. Watch your mouse pointer freeze on drag mode, disabling it effectively; keyboard does not seem to respond as well. After ~15 seconds, when gedit windows are killed, you'll get your mouse and keyboard back. Can anyone confirm? -- Pedro

4 6

[Fedora QA] #291: Proposed Test Day - JBoss Application Server
by fedora-badges 08 Jun '12

08 Jun '12

#291: Proposed Test Day - JBoss Application Server ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: goldmann | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ I would like to propose a new test day for JBoss Application Server. This is a big and long awaited feature for Fedora. I would like to see some community testing for it. I would appreciate help on making some noise about it from the QA team if it gets accepted :) The initial spec file will be submitted for review '''today'''. Proposed test day date: Mon 16th April, second choice - day later: Tue 17th April. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JBossAS7 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JBossAS7 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/291> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

[Fedora QA] #290: Proposed Test Day - KDE 4.8
by fedora-badges 08 Jun '12

08 Jun '12

#290: Proposed Test Day - KDE 4.8 ----------------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: martix | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: KDE desktop plasma testday | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------------------------+------------------------ After discussion with jreznik, I propose KDE 4.8 test day on 2012-04-26. We should do integration tests and test basic desktop functionality. Feature page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KDE48 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/290> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
34
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test May 2012