[Fedora QA] #180: Create Package Specific Test Cases for Design Suite
by fedora-badges
#180: Create Package Specific Test Cases for Design Suite
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: sdz | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Wiki | Version:
Keywords: design suite, package test plan |
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
The Design Suite has been promoted at SXSW and other conferences. We want
to make sure that the included applications are all working and in a good
state. Adam introduced package specific test cases at FUDCon in Tempe. We
should consider creating test cases for the most important tools, such as
blender, gimp, inkscape and shotwell.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/180>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
11 years, 8 months
[Fedora QA] #287: Add Bodhi testing guidelines to Bodhi?
by fedora-badges
#287: Add Bodhi testing guidelines to Bodhi?
-------------------------+------------------
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Wiki | Version:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
-------------------------+------------------
My thinking process:
1. I was about to test
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.9.3.997-0.7.fc17
2. I realized I don't know what karma to post when NM works in general,
but I haven't tested the linked bug fixes
3. I know we have some karma guidelines somewhere on the wiki
4. I couldn't find the page
5. I found the page at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester#Feedback_procedures after
some time
6. My use case doesn't seem to be mentioned anyway. But that's not
important. The question is - shouldn't we link these instructions directly
from the bodhi page? No one will find it otherwise.
That wiki page is proven tester specific, but the "Feedback procedures"
chapter is not. I think it would be really worth the effort to create a
new wiki page containing just guidelines for correct karma posting and
then ask Bodhi maintainers to link that page directly from the Bodhi page.
I imagine it could be displayed besides the "Add a comment" text are,
named something like "Karma posting guidelines".
What do you think?
Does anyone feel like volunteering for creating this separate wiki page?
I'll gladly create a ticket for Bodhi afterwards.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/287>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
11 years, 8 months
[Fedora QA] #235: request: add tests for new grub2 stage2 device types
by fedora-badges
#235: request: add tests for new grub2 stage2 device types
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: dlehman | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version:
Keywords: |
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
= phenomenon =
GRUB2 supports several new md raid levels (0,4,5,6,10) and also lvm
logical volumes as the /boot device. It would be nice to get some testing
coverage for this, including combinations like root on lvm (no separate
/boot) w/ md raid pvs.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/235>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
11 years, 8 months
[Fedora QA] #280: Request for F17 firewalld test day on 2012-03-15
by fedora-badges
#280: Request for F17 firewalld test day on 2012-03-15
-----------------------------------------+------------------
Reporter: twoerner | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
-----------------------------------------+------------------
I'd like to run a firewalld test day on 2012-03-15. firewalld is the new
firewall solution in Fedora with network zones support.
The tests should cover interaction with NetworkManager, libvirt and
printer configuration/discovery. Maybe more tests are possible for other
projects.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/280>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
11 years, 9 months
Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
by Ed Greshko
On 04/26/2012 11:40 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> There was support added to the F17 kernel as well as the F17 nfs-utils,
> namely the nfsidmap command which replaces the need for the
> rpc.idmapd daemon.
Thanks....
11 years, 10 months