[Fedora QA] #134: Clarify the ISO to USB tests
by fedora-badges
#134: Clarify the ISO to USB tests
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: rhe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Review | Version:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
We've heard many users installing by writing ISO to USB drive and having
problems about it. So it's better to have a clear story from anaconda or
whoever on what exactly is supported in terms of writing the DVD image to
USB, and what isn't. It would be good to clear it up and add some specific
install validation tests for it.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/134>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 8 months
[Fedora QA] #79: Add firstboot release criteria
by fedora-badges
#79: Add firstboot release criteria
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jlaska | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Wiki | Version:
Keywords: retrospective |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
= problem =
See [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=574596
RHBZ#574596 - Smolt does not run at firstboot]
= analysis =
We don't have a way to know what firstboot modules are expected, we need
to document this as release criteria, or write a test to report the issue
(for details, see RHBZ #574596).
= enhancement recommendation =
The release criteria do not include what
image:Package-x-generic-16.pngfirstboot modules are intended for Fedora.
Often, firstboot some modules are missing or disabled, and we don't notice
or know whether this is a blocker. Recommend clarifying the use cases of
firstboot in the release criteria.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/79>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 8 months
Pre-Beta Acceptance Test Plan
by Tao Wu
Greetings folks,
Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the pre-beta acceptance test run of Fedora 15. Thanks for your attention. It is a good news that the pre-RC installation version has passed the major test, which is used to identify any major test blockers prior to the Test Compose (TC).Let's expect the exciting coming out of F15-TC1 next week!
If you have spare time and want to contribute by verify this version, the test cases and results can be found on the following URL:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Pre-RC_Acceptance_T...
Thanks a lot!
Good Luck,
Tao Wu
12 years, 9 months
Housekeeping
by Adam Williamson
This is kind of half a memo-to-self, but of course, the more people who
help out, the merrier :)
So we have various housekeeping tasks that come under the Bugzappers
umbrella, and may have been neglected lately:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora15
since we haven't run a Bugzappers meeting for a while we should check up
on these and make sure they're happening; it may make sense to pull them
into the QA process instead of Bugzappers, or just run a BZ meeting to
look after them.
If anyone is already working on this, or has a good plan, do speak up!
Otherwise I'll look at doing something about it.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
12 years, 10 months
[Fedora QA] #84: Define install matrix baseline
by fedora-badges
#84: Define install matrix baseline
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jlaska | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Wiki | Version:
Keywords: retrospective |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
= problem =
* We almost didn't find [http://bugzilla.redhat.com/578633 RHBZ#578633 -
Unable to enter passphrase to unlock encrypted disk partitions]
* When re-using test results from a previous test run, it's possible to
include results for tests that should be re-tested. This would be bad.
= analysis =
* F-13 Beta candidate#3 didn't include the correct version of
''plymouth'' (see RHBZ #578633).
* Since it was Beta#3 and not much was supposed to change from Beta#2,
some test results from the previous Beta#2 candidate were carried forward.
* Thankfully, QA found the problem before release while running the
QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_(encrypted)_install test.
= enhancement recommendation =
* Establish better guidelines about which test results can be carried
forward from one candidate to the next (this isn't easy). Or perhaps,
establish a subset of tests that all respins must undergo.
* Perhaps link to, or document at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/84>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 10 months
[Fedora QA] #194: proven tester request
by fedora-badges
#194: proven tester request
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: sanchez | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version:
Keywords: |
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Hi all,
I would like to join the Fedora project actively, and I believe testing
packages could be my first step on the project. I do have experience with
Linux for many years now, as a professional as well as a hobbyist. I can
also do some scripting with python and bash and always had interest in
opensource, testing, GPL , HA clustering etc.
Salud!,
Raúl,
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/194>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 10 months