rawhide installation problem
by Simon Lanzmich
Today I attempted to do a http / ftp installation.
Since the boot.iso from rawhide does not boot, I tried the boot.iso from
FC5test1, which boots fine.
(Actually, I did not burn the iso to a CD but instead I extracted its
contents on my disk and booted it with grub - This usually worked very
well, or is this what is meant by "Hard drive install is broken" in the
release announcement?)
However, I don't get very far with the installation. The installer
complains that it can't retrieve Fedora/base/stage2.img and I see the
following messages when I press Alt+F3 / Alt+F4:
transferring
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/x86_6... to a fd (I usually use a mirror, but I wanted to be sure that this is not the problem)
mntloop loop0 on /mnt/runtime as /tmp/ramfs/stage2.img is 43
failed to mount loop: Invalid argument
Error mounting /dev/loop0 on /mnt/runtume (Invalid argument)
and
<4> Unable to identify CD-ROM format.
<4> VFS: Can't find an ext2 filesystem on dev loop0
<3> cramfs: wrong magic
<3> Fat: bogus number of FAT structure
<6> VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev loop0
18 years, 3 months
rawhide report: 20051227 changes
by Build System
Updated Packages:
scim-tables-0.5.5-2
-------------------
* Mon Dec 26 2005 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> - 0.5.5-2
- remove the Japanese and Korean tables and their subpackages
Broken deps for i386
----------------------------------------------------------
GFS-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.2.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
GFS-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.2.i686 requires kernel = 0:2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
GFS-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.2.i686 requires kernel-smp = 0:2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
GFS-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.2.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1775_FC5smp
cman-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
cman-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.i686 requires kernel = 0:2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
cman-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.i686 requires kernel-smp = 0:2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
cman-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1775_FC5smp
dlm-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1783_FC5
dlm-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.i686 requires kernel = 0:2.6.14-1.1783_FC5
dlm-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1783_FC5smp
dlm-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.i686 requires kernel-smp = 0:2.6.14-1.1783_FC5
gnbd-kernel - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.12.4.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1777_FC5
gnbd-kernel - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.12.4.i686 requires kernel = 0:2.6.14-1.1777_FC5
gnbd-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.12.4.i686 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1777_FC5smp
gnbd-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.12.4.i686 requires kernel-smp = 0:2.6.14-1.1777_FC5
jacorb - 2.2-3jpp_3fc.i386 requires libgcj.so.6
jonas - 4.3.3-1jpp_15fc.i386 requires libgcj.so.6
jonas-examples - 4.3.3-1jpp_15fc.i386 requires libgcj.so.6
Broken deps for ia64
----------------------------------------------------------
jacorb - 2.2-3jpp_3fc.ia64 requires libgcj.so.6()(64bit)
rgmanager - 1.9.31-3.ia64 requires ccs
Broken deps for ppc
----------------------------------------------------------
cman - 1.0.3-5.FC5.ppc requires cman-kernel-modules >= 0:2.6.11
dlm - 1.0.0-7.FC5.ppc requires dlm-kernel-modules >= 0:2.6.11
gnbd - 1.0.1-2.ppc requires gnbd-kernel-modules >= 0:2.6.11
jacorb - 2.2-3jpp_3fc.ppc requires libgcj.so.6
jonas - 4.3.3-1jpp_15fc.ppc requires libgcj.so.6
jonas-examples - 4.3.3-1jpp_15fc.ppc requires libgcj.so.6
Broken deps for ppc64
----------------------------------------------------------
cman - 1.0.3-5.FC5.ppc64 requires cman-kernel-modules >= 0:2.6.11
dlm - 1.0.0-7.FC5.ppc64 requires dlm-kernel-modules >= 0:2.6.11
emacs - 21.4-5.ppc64 requires fonts-xorg-75dpi
gnbd - 1.0.1-2.ppc64 requires gnbd-kernel-modules >= 0:2.6.11
jacorb - 2.2-3jpp_3fc.ppc64 requires libgcj.so.6()(64bit)
Broken deps for s390
----------------------------------------------------------
jacorb - 2.2-3jpp_3fc.s390 requires libgcj.so.6
jonas - 4.3.3-1jpp_15fc.s390 requires libgcj.so.6
jonas-examples - 4.3.3-1jpp_15fc.s390 requires libgcj.so.6
Broken deps for s390x
----------------------------------------------------------
jacorb - 2.2-3jpp_3fc.s390x requires libgcj.so.6()(64bit)
libvte-java - 0.11.11-7.s390x requires libgtkjava-2.8.so()(64bit)
libvte-java - 0.11.11-7.s390x requires libgtkjni-2.8.so()(64bit)
Broken deps for x86_64
----------------------------------------------------------
GFS-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.2.x86_64 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
GFS-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.2.x86_64 requires kernel = 0:2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
cman-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.x86_64 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
cman-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.x86_64 requires kernel = 0:2.6.14-1.1775_FC5
dlm-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.x86_64 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1783_FC5
dlm-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.3.x86_64 requires kernel = 0:2.6.14-1.1783_FC5
gnbd-kernel - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.12.4.x86_64 requires /lib/modules/2.6.14-1.1777_FC5
gnbd-kernel - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.12.4.x86_64 requires kernel = 0:2.6.14-1.1777_FC5
jacorb - 2.2-3jpp_3fc.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.6()(64bit)
jonas - 4.3.3-1jpp_15fc.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.6()(64bit)
jonas-examples - 4.3.3-1jpp_15fc.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.6()(64bit)
18 years, 3 months
x86_64 and i386 rpms
by Paul F. Johnson
Hi,
I have duplicate copies of x86_64 and i386 rpms installed on my box
(this appears to have occured when I did the full install a few weeks
back on the new 64bit box).
Is there any problem with me ditching the i386 rpms or to they provide
something the 64 bit versions don't?
TTFN
Paul
--
main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86,
0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2,
_+1,"%s %d %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}
+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K
w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]
'/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n
'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c ;;{nl'-{}
rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}##
(!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1
):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l
,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);}
18 years, 3 months
x86_64 and i386 rpms
by Paul F. Johnson
Hi,
I have duplicate copies of x86_64 and i386 rpms installed on my box
(this appears to have occured when I did the full install a few weeks
back on the new 64bit box).
Is there any problem with me ditching the i386 rpms or to they provide
something the 64 bit versions don't?
TTFN
Paul
--
main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86,
0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2,
_+1,"%s %d %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}
+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K
w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]
'/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n
'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c ;;{nl'-{}
rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}##
(!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1
):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l
,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);}
18 years, 3 months
x86_64 and i386 rpms
by Paul F. Johnson
Hi,
I have duplicate copies of x86_64 and i386 rpms installed on my box
(this appears to have occured when I did the full install a few weeks
back on the new 64bit box).
Is there any problem with me ditching the i386 rpms or to they provide
something the 64 bit versions don't?
TTFN
Paul
--
main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86,
0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2,
_+1,"%s %d %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}
+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K
w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]
'/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n
'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c ;;{nl'-{}
rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}##
(!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1
):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l
,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);}
18 years, 3 months
kernel-2.6.14-1.1637, 1653: long delay after "Uncompressing..." phase
by Ville Herva
Since kernel-2.6.14-1.1637, there has been a long delay during boot after
the "Uncompressing..." line. It takes about a minute or so, and judging
from the sound of the fan, it appears to take 100% CPU. Observed on a Compaq
AP250 PIII 866MHz. Earlier kernels did not have this glitch.
Ok:
kernel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
kernel-2.6.12-1.1447_FC4
kernel-2.6.12-1.1456_FC4
kernel-2.6.13-1.1526_FC4
kernel-2.6.13-1.1532_FC4
Long delay (about minute or so):
kernel-2.6.14-1.1637_FC4
kernel-2.6.14-1.1653_FC4
Hardware:
Vendor: Compaq
Version: 686J2 v2.04
Release Date: 12/04/2000
Address: 0xE0000
Runtime Size: 128 kB
ROM Size: 512 kB
Manufacturer: Compaq
Product Name: Professional Workstation AP250
Socket Designation: XU1
Type: Central Processor
Family: Pentium III
Manufacturer: Intel
Signature: Type 0, Family 6, Model 8, Stepping 6
Version: Pentium(R) III processor 866 MHz
Voltage: 2.0 V
External Clock: 133 MHz
Max Speed: 1000 MHz
Current Speed: 866 MHz
18 years, 3 months
xorg-x11-drivers
by Clyde E. Kunkel
Hello,
Is it safe to just yum update the specific xorg-x11-drv-<driver> for my
graphics card instead of installing all of them? yum wanted to update
install about 53 drivers it looks like.
--
Regards,
Old Fart
(my reply to address is "munged" to avoid spambots)
18 years, 3 months
#prelink# semi-disaster
by Jim Cornette
Trying to launch ppracer, I ended up having a permission error. When
investigating the library which I was having permission errors with, I
found out that the library was linked to a #prelink#<random-number> file.
Deleting all of the #prelink#<random> from /tmp left one obviously
broken symlink to /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
Anyway, is there an option to any option to find broken symlinks
system-wide.
Most importantly, for programs that can break the sanity of the system
if you are shutting down the computer, are there any mechanisms being
developed to prevent system shutdown until processes such as prelink,
updating system in the background are not in a sane condition.
To fix the above problem, I deleted the database entries for the library
that had the broken dep and all associated rpms. I then yum installed
the same packages that were db entry only removed.
Jim
--
My computer can beat up your computer.
- Karl Lehenbauer
18 years, 3 months
Re: generating zope.conf (zope 2.9) patch
by Mihamina Rakotomandimby
> > I edited Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in
> > And generated the patch as folllow.
> > $ diff -Naur Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original
> You are in a wrong directory judging from what you write later.
> > Patch #0 (zope-2.9.0-config.patch):
> > + patch -p1 -b --suffix .config -s
> If you have this '-p1' then you should start in BUILD/ when creating
> patch.
Ok. Thank you.
> > %setup -q -n Zope-%{version} #-a 10
> So your top directory is not called 'Zope'.
Erm... The sources unpack into a directory called
Zope-2.9-xxx
Then there is a subdir in it, called "Zope".
> > %patch0 -p1 -b .config
> Possibly '-p0' above instead of '-p1', which means "skip one level
> of directories", will be good enough although patches to be used
> with '-p1' better document how they were really generated (which
> may be useful in the future).
I'll try and report.
Plese would you reply on the list? so that more people can discuss :-)
I already set the Reply-To address, if the Mailing List manager does not
overwrite it, just replying will be OK.
--
A powerfull GroupWare, CMS, CRM, ECM: CPS (Open Source & GPL).
Opengroupware, SPIP, Plone, PhpBB, JetSpeed... are good: CPS is better.
http://www.cps-project.org for downloads & documentation.
Free hosting of CPS groupware: http://www.objectis.org.
18 years, 3 months
Today's attempted rawhide install
by Mike Chambers
I too have also ran into the kernel oops from trying to install rawhide
this morning.
I understand a bug has already been filed for this. Is there a fix in
the works or set to come out today by chance?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"It's only funny until someone gets hurt, then it's hilarious!"
18 years, 3 months