On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 00:49 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 22:21 +0000, mythmail(a)runbox.com wrote:
> Thanks Spike!
>
> It looks like extending the AD to cater for UIDs and GIDs is the most supported and
least effort change to allow us to use any NAS.
>
> If we get approval, we'll likely come up with a system to populate these values
in the AD from an existing SSSD Linux client so that they match, then we can transition
all other Linux clients over from using the SSSD mapping algorithm to using these values
from AD.
>
This is what we do too. Only way to make sure UID/GID are known for all apps, NAS
included.
And while you do the above, add SHELL and HOME too, possibly something more I cannot
remember.
>
> Ed
>
>
> 4 May 2022 12:26:01 am Spike White <spikewhitetx(a)gmail.com>:
>
> > Ed,
> >
> > Got this from our AD team:
> >
> > This MS article contains info regarding RFC 2307 and mentions it being included
in Window 2003 and later. Hopefully, this helps.
> >
> >
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.mi...
> >
> > We are currently up to schema version 88 (Windows 2019).
> >
> > Spike
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list -- sssd-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-users-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.fe...
> List Guidelines:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffedorap...
> List Archives:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.f...
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpagure....