On (14/04/15 10:36), Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:33:18AM +0200, Thomas HUMMEL wrote:
> > But I do not expect any problem with memory cache.
As a matter of fact, we tested it and no memory cache does not change our problem...
I spent lot of time with debugging memory cache bugs so I expected there cannot
be a problem.
At least you reduce scope of problem.
Thank you very much for troubleshooting. I hope you/we will fix the bug very
soon.
LS