Thanks! And totally agree with nscd being a crap 


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien@leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Daniel Jung wrote:

According to the redhat/fedora doc on this subject is to suggesting that
sssd is not meant to run with nscd but could be ran with nscd caching host
only and rest to sssd. Curious to hear of lists opinions on this setup.
Benefits of not runnig nscd at all and run sssd only and use no nscd at
all. 

Yes.  I've run it in that mode, and had no bother.  In the end, I switched to
dnsmasq running locally, as nscd's caching of host data is, as far as I knew,
totally crap.

jh

--
John Hodrien
Specialist IT and Unix, IT
Faculty of Engineering
0113 3435471
9.26 EC Stoner

_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users