Thanks! And totally agree with nscd being a crap
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien(a)leeds.ac.uk>
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Daniel Jung wrote:
According to the redhat/fedora doc on this subject is to suggesting that
> sssd is not meant to run with nscd but could be ran with nscd caching host
> only and rest to sssd. Curious to hear of lists opinions on this setup.
> Benefits of not runnig nscd at all and run sssd only and use no nscd at
> all.
>
Yes. I've run it in that mode, and had no bother. In the end, I switched
to
dnsmasq running locally, as nscd's caching of host data is, as far as I
knew,
totally crap.
jh
--
John Hodrien
Specialist IT and Unix, IT
Faculty of Engineering
0113 3435471
9.26 EC Stoner
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
sssd-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users