On 01/11/13 10:00, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
Yes it is guaranteed to be there (or we can safely assume so) if we
use
Ldap_id_mapping = False
-----Original Message-----
From: sssd-users-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:sssd-users-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Hrozek
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 10:52 AM
To: sssd-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [SSSD-users] AD provider uses wrong user attribute?
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:36:05AM +0000, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Looks like the AD provider in sssd honors sAMAccountname attribute instead of the
'uid' (which is more in line with the RFC2307).
> Is this intentional or a bug?
>
> Thanks,
> Ondrej
Intentional, is UID guaranteed to be there in all setups even if RFC2307 attributes are
not present on the AD side?
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
sssd-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
sssd-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users I wouldn't like to
bet on 'uid' being there on Samba4 AD if the user is
created with samba-tool, 'uid' is an optional attribute.
Rowland