On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 13:29 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:Actually in Fedora we are proposing to install unbound by default as
> On 06/11/2014 08:06 AM, Daniel Jung wrote:
> > Thanks! And totally agree with nscd being a crap
> SSSD provides fast caching of users and groups similar to nscd.
> For other maps you have to decide what tool is best. Nscd is an option
> but we really want to hear about the reason why it is needed.
> dnsmasq is a preferred solution for hosts.
caching name server because it can do DNSSEC properly.
So in general we favor a proper DNS caching daemon over nscd.
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
sssd-users mailing list