On 06/11/2014 08:06 AM, Daniel Jung wrote:
Thanks! And totally agree with nscd being a crap


SSSD provides fast caching of users and groups similar to nscd.
For other maps you have to decide what tool is best. Nscd is an option but we really want to hear about the reason why it is needed.
dnsmasq is a preferred solution for hosts.



On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:39 AM, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien@leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Daniel Jung wrote:

According to the redhat/fedora doc on this subject is to suggesting that
sssd is not meant to run with nscd but could be ran with nscd caching host
only and rest to sssd. Curious to hear of lists opinions on this setup.
Benefits of not runnig nscd at all and run sssd only and use no nscd at
all. 

Yes.  I've run it in that mode, and had no bother.  In the end, I switched to
dnsmasq running locally, as nscd's caching of host data is, as far as I knew,
totally crap.

jh

--
John Hodrien
Specialist IT and Unix, IT
Faculty of Engineering
0113 3435471
9.26 EC Stoner

_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users




_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users


-- 
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal

Sr. Engineering Manager IdM portfolio
Red Hat, Inc.