On 08.07.2016 11:33, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
our upstream front page still lists 1.9 as LTM, which is maybe true
technically, because we haven't proclaimed any other release as LTM, but
1.9 is also very old and upstream we really just tell users to upgrade to
1.13.
So I think we should just name 1.13 as our LTM. We already backport all
important fixes to sssd-1-13 branch anyway. RHEL-6 is (probably) going
to stick with 1.13 for the rest of its lifetime, but I wonder if this
would play well with Suse and Ubuntu..Howard, Timo, are your long-term
maintenance distributions using 1.13 and would sticking with 1.13 for them
also make sense for you?
Hi, makes perfect sense to me as 16.04 is shipping with 1.13.4.
--
t