On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 09:16 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 14:17 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> While working on #1173 I noticed that we are producing debug messages
> that looks like:
>
> (Fri Feb 10 13:46:22 2012) [sssd[sudo]] [sysdb_sudo_check_time]
> (0x1000): notBefore attribute is missing, the rule is valid
> (Fri Feb 10 13:46:22 2012) [sssd[sudo]] [sysdb_sudo_check_time]
> (0x1000): notBefore attribute is missing, the rule is valid
> (Fri Feb 10 13:46:22 2012) [sssd[sudo]] [sysdb_sudo_check_time]
> (0x1000): notBefore attribute is missing, the rule is valid
> (Fri Feb 10 13:46:22 2012) [sssd[sudo]] [sysdb_sudo_check_time]
> (0x1000): notBefore attribute is missing, the rule is valid
> (Fri Feb 10 13:46:22 2012) [sssd[sudo]] [sysdb_sudo_check_time]
> (0x1000): notBefore attribute is missing, the rule is valid
>
> This is not very informational. This patch adds a name of the rule to
> these messages.
Ack.
Pushed to master and sssd-18