Hi,
some of the compiler flags used to build Fedora packages, e.g. '-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2' produces some extra warnings which were not addressed so far. Except the ones for krb5_common.c in 0001 they are cosmetics but might still irritate some people or tools.
bye, Sumit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2010 11:32 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
some of the compiler flags used to build Fedora packages, e.g. '-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2' produces some extra warnings which were not addressed so far. Except the ones for krb5_common.c in 0001 they are cosmetics but might still irritate some people or tools.
bye, Sumit
ACK
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2010 05:32 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
some of the compiler flags used to build Fedora packages, e.g. '-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2' produces some extra warnings which were not addressed so far. Except the ones for krb5_common.c in 0001 they are cosmetics but might still irritate some people or tools.
Nack.
If you're going to address the warning in write_krb5info_file(), would you mind solving ALL of https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/631 in the process?
- -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:20:02AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2010 05:32 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
some of the compiler flags used to build Fedora packages, e.g. '-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2' produces some extra warnings which were not addressed so far. Except the ones for krb5_common.c in 0001 they are cosmetics but might still irritate some people or tools.
Nack.
If you're going to address the warning in write_krb5info_file(), would you mind solving ALL of https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/631 in the process?
sure, new versions attached.
bye, Sumit
Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkyciWEACgkQeiVVYja6o6MvfQCfbG92pu/PrOI6P1kOTG49ctR4 lZQAnA7ouxRoJP9sim9w2Cy6Sk9RSH30 =EoTO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2010 08:03 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:20:02AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: If you're going to address the warning in write_krb5info_file(), would you mind solving ALL of https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/631 in the process?
sure, new versions attached.
Ack.
- -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2010 08:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 09/24/2010 08:03 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:20:02AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: If you're going to address the warning in write_krb5info_file(), would you mind solving ALL of https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/631 in the process?
sure, new versions attached.
Ack.
Pushed both to master.
- -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
-
Jakub Hrozek -
Stephen Gallagher -
Sumit Bose