Good morining Jakub.
Thanks very much for the info, 1.13 has been performing extremely well in my tests, it is
a very good release.
Have a lovely weekend.
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> our upstream front page still lists 1.9 as LTM, which is maybe true
> technically, because we haven't proclaimed any other release as LTM, but
> 1.9 is also very old and upstream we really just tell users to upgrade to
> So I think we should just name 1.13 as our LTM. We already backport all
> important fixes to sssd-1-13 branch anyway. RHEL-6 is (probably) going
> to stick with 1.13 for the rest of its lifetime, but I wonder if this
> would play well with Suse and Ubuntu..Howard, Timo, are your long-term
> maintenance distributions using 1.13 and would sticking with 1.13 for them
> also make sense for you?
Show replies by date