Jakub Hrozek wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 07/22/2010 05:32 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
> The current doc includes the following statement in the section on
> configuring failover (Section 126.96.36.199.4. Configuring Failover):
> "Future versions of SSSD will throw an error upon receiving additional
> ldap_uri entries."
> Does this mean SSSD will fail somehow, or display an error message
> advising the user of a config error, or what exactly? "throw an error"
> is ambiguous.
I think what it meant to say was that the way to configure LDAP failover
is to specify multiple URIs in a single ldap_uri parameter, not multiple
ldap_uri parameters. We will be able to detect configuration errors such
as this one when a configuration validator is available, until that
time, we just silently use the last ldap_uri entry.
I think that's covered ok in the actual description of how to use
multiple URIs for failover (which I'll include below). I just wasn't
sure about the "throw an error" part.
" Do not use multiple ldap_uri parameters to specify your failover
servers. The failover servers must be entered as a comma-separated list
of values for a single ldap_uri parameter. If you enter multiple
ldap_uri parameters, SSSD only recognizes the last entry.
Future versions of SSSD will throw an error upon receiving additional
ldap_uri entries. "
This is part of the "Configuring Failover" section mentioned in the
Senior Technical Writer, Engineering Content Services
Red Hat Asia Pacific Pty Ltd
193 North Quay, Brisbane
"We couldn't care less about comfort. We make you feel good."
Federico Minoli CEO Ducati Motor S.p.A.