On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:38:55AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 08:28:25PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1440
> > Looks like some LDAP servers are able to store empty attribute
> > values. For some servers it results in syntax error, so it is
> > probably a rare case (if not an error) to have such values. LDB
> > seems to be unable to handle such values too, so in this patch we
> > skip empty values and do not store them to local cache.
> > Patch is attached.
> > Thanks
> > Michal
> I double checked this scenario with Rich.
> Technically an "empty" value could have been legal for cases where the
> was an octet string with a single zero byte. Treating such attribute as
> if it was missing is probably the right thing to do. For the objects
> we care about, this value is possible only with old server that don't do
> syntaxt validation.
Pushed to master.
The commit was pushed to sssd-1-9 at the same time it was pushed to
master. I also pushed it to sssd-1-8 now as we just had a user hitting
the problem on #sssd apparently.