-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 09/13/2010 04:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:43:33 -0400
Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 09/13/2010 03:41 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:09:28 -0400
>> Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Sorry, noticed a tiny oversight on patch 0001. I had only fixed the
>>> DEBUG message for the add case, and missed the del case. The new
>>> patch 0001 corrects this.
>> Aren't those bugs a separate issue worth their own patch ?
>> (there is also no mention of this issue in the commit message
> I can split them out. I only included them because I needed to fix
> them to help identify the real problem.
They are a potential crash bug, so it would be better if we separated
them as they are a fix on their own.
If you split them you get as bonus an automatic ack for all three :)
Split and attached for posterity. Thanks for the review.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----