On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:12 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:30:01PM -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
> Hi, i would comment for to see if i'm wrong.
>
> Ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1339
>
> "auth_provider = none" already exists (it seems)
>
> Reading theory in
>
http://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/sssd/1.8.91/man/sssd.conf.5.html
> mentions that:
>
> auth_provider (string)
> "none" disallows password changes explicitly.
> Default: "id_provider" is used if it is set and can handle
authentication
> requests.
>
> in data_provider_be.c
> [code]
> if (strcasecmp(mod_name, NO_PROVIDER) == 0) {
> ret = ENOENT;
> goto done;
> }
> [/code]
>
> and by placing "id_provider = proxy" the default auth_provider=
> id_provider (proxy) , this ago that request proxy_pam_target.
>
> this is correct?
>
> Thanks.
I think you're right. I bumped the ticket back to NEEDS_TRIAGE so we can
discuss if we close it (and what to do with the assiociated RHBZ).
Okay, I guess I must have gotten confused because of the 'default to
id_provider' approach we took.
Thanks Ariel for investigating this. I think we can close it as INVALID.