On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:06 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 14:34 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > The fact that we were keeping it in memory for the full duration
> > of the cache timeout meant that we would never reap the benefits
> > of the midpoint cache refresh.
> One modification. I realized that we should maintain the same minimum
> time for the midpoint cache that we do elsewhere (10 seconds), so I set
> that explicitly if it's lower.
> Also, I realize it looks like there's a divide-by-zero issue if the
> nowait percentage is set to 100, but that's protected against already in
One more fix. I forgot to accomodate the case where the nowait cache is
Acked by Simo on IRC.
Pushed to master and sssd-1-8.