-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 03/30/2011 04:47 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> We were not fully compliant with section 5.3 of RFC 2307 which
> An account's GECOS field is preferably determined by a value of the
> gecos attribute. If no gecos attribute exists, the value of the cn
> attribute MUST be used. (The existence of the gecos attribute allows
> information embedded in the GECOS field, such as a user's telephone
> number, to be returned to the client without overloading the cn
> attribute. It also accommodates directories where the common name
> does not contain the user's full name.)
> Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/703
Ack, just one little nitpick: line
+ if (el->num_values == 0) gecos = NULL;
Redundancy removed. Redundancy removed.
Pushed to master and sssd-1-5.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----