On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:55:43PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 11/10/2015 02:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:11:25AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>another warning on rhel6.
>>BTW different solution would be to cast to void.
>I prefer this solution
Why? I think that changing value of input parameter is generally a discouraged practice,
although in our code base it's common. (I'm just asking I'm *not* nacking the
It seems more readable that the parameter is changed. It's not really
input parameter per se, its refcount is increased.