Previously, they were reported with the prefix "Error:" which caused confusion among end-users while debugging.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:59:04PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Previously, they were reported with the prefix "Error:" which caused confusion among end-users while debugging.
From 1eab40ce4113fb80f50f60dfe7850275e775ab48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:57:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] SYSDB: Make ENOENT log messages less threatening
Previously, they were reported with the prefix "Error:" which caused confusion among end-users while debugging.
Thanks, there's been multiple users reporting this benign message as an error.
Ack.
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 23:23 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 03:59:04PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Previously, they were reported with the prefix "Error:" which caused confusion among end-users while debugging.
From 1eab40ce4113fb80f50f60dfe7850275e775ab48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:57:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] SYSDB: Make ENOENT log messages less threatening
Previously, they were reported with the prefix "Error:" which caused confusion among end-users while debugging.
Thanks, there's been multiple users reporting this benign message as an error.
Ack.
Pushed to master.
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org