This is a backport of Stephen's patch 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the sssd-1-5 branch as well.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
This is a backport of Stephen's patch 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the sssd-1-5 branch as well.
The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
This is a backport of Stephen's patch 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the sssd-1-5 branch as well.
The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5 "LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
LS
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
This is a backport of Stephen's patch 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the sssd-1-5 branch as well.
The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5 "LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
LS
Yes, it's not strictly necessary but might come handy. New patches are attached.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
This is a backport of Stephen's patch 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the sssd-1-5 branch as well.
The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5 "LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
LS
Yes, it's not strictly necessary but might come handy. New patches are attached.
One more patch is attached to amend the man page.
On (29/04/13 16:50), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
This is a backport of Stephen's patch 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the sssd-1-5 branch as well.
The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5 "LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
LS
Yes, it's not strictly necessary but might come handy. New patches are attached.
One more patch is attached to amend the man page.
3x Ack
LS
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:37:32PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (29/04/13 16:50), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
This is a backport of Stephen's patch 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the sssd-1-5 branch as well.
The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5 "LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
LS
Yes, it's not strictly necessary but might come handy. New patches are attached.
One more patch is attached to amend the man page.
3x Ack
Pushed to sssd-1-5.
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org