On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:37:04AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (09/02/16 08:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:30:36PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello, please see trivial patch attached. Thanks.
From 6d5f6b71c2d2f891470dc1c9f08ae67f5b6c02f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Reichl preichl@redhat.com Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:27:01 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] PAM: Clarify man page for domains option
Resolves: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2946
src/man/pam_sss.8.xml | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/man/pam_sss.8.xml b/src/man/pam_sss.8.xml index 7794d3acfdfdbde491a3e1ada44481b73588e41f..278126c14d0a574a1e120762af264ef653deb0b0 100644 --- a/src/man/pam_sss.8.xml +++ b/src/man/pam_sss.8.xml @@ -145,9 +145,11 @@ SSSD domain names, as specified in the sssd.conf file. </para> <para>
NOTE: Must be used in conjunction with the
<quote>pam_trusted_users</quote> and
<quote>pam_public_domains</quote> options.
NOTE: If PAM service is being run by untrusted user
(<quote>pam_trusted_users</quote> option)
then please make
sure that restricted domains are public
(<quote>pam_public_domains</quote> option). Please see the <citerefentry> <refentrytitle>sssd.conf</refentrytitle>
-- 2.4.3
I'm sorry, but this doesn't read any better to me. Especially I don't understand "restricted domains are public", sounds like an oxymoron to me.
Should we ask Aneta for help/review ?
Maybe, but it was her who asked us to improve this paragraph in the first place :)