URL:
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/511
Title: #511: Do not shutdown KCM/Secrets responders when activities are happening ...
fidencio commented:
"""
I'm fine with those changes proposed. I'm adding the "Changes Requested"
label and will be working on them.
As I don't think there's an easy way to test the responder idle timeout with our
infra (and please, correct me if I'm mistaken) I'd like to ask whether we can have
an upstream (that should be cloned to downstream) issue to refer these patches to and also
to ensure they're covered by at least one of our tests ... does that make sense,
@jhrozek?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/511#issuecomment-363802161