On (10/11/15 14:55), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 11/10/2015 02:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:11:25AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>ehlo,
>>
>>another warning on rhel6.
>
>ACK
>
>>
>>BTW different solution would be to cast to void.
>
>I prefer this solution
Why? I think that changing value of input parameter is generally a discouraged practice,
although in our code base it's common. (I'm just asking I'm *not* nacking the
patch.)
It is a macro which return itself.
Without changing anything.
It is basicly noop.
int a = 1;
a = a;
LS