On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 12:14:53AM -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
sorry if I made them waste time.
Well after some drawbacks to create the test environment seems to be already.
>Nack. Did you test this?
>The function monitor_config_file() just adds a file to the list of files
>that are being monitored. What you need to do is call to signal all of
>the monitor's children to perform a res_init() with
>service_signal_res_init().
yes, I not knew some features in vimrc.
I added these revisions :)
>Also, as Dmitri mentioned, *please* fix the whitespace issues. We use
>four spaces for indentation. No tabs, please.
Much better, Ariel, thank you!
I have two very minor requests to make the patch more readable:
1) I think you can reuse service_signal_dns_reload instead of the
new function service_signal_res_init, the two functions are
identical. It is good practice to keep the code duplication as low
as possible.
2) I don't understand why you pass the private void pointer to
signal_res_init() instead of passing struct mt_ctx * directly?
Can you either pass the monitor context directly or fold
signal_res_init() into signal_offline_reset()
Functionally, the patch is fine. Thanks again.