On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:19 +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Pavel Březina
<pbrezina(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>
>> The design page is done [0] and it's based on this discussion [1] we
>> had on this very same mailing list. A pull-request with the
>> implementation is already opened [2].
>>
>> [0]:
>>
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SocketActivatableResponders
>> [1]:
>>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahoste...
>> [2]:
htatps://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/84
>
>
> I think we should also provide 'disabled_services' option, to give admins a
> way to explicitly disable some responders if the don't want to used them.
I have to double check a few things here but, AFAIU, just having the
socket disabled (systemctl disable sssd-@responder@.socket) should be
enough.
I guess I misunderstood what ou mean by "provide 'disabled_services'
option", I though you wanted to add that option to sssd.conf
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York