On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 13:55 +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 17:30 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 04:25:50PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > some more generally useful logging messages are needed for that
> > > bugzilla.
> > >
> > > Patches for both master and 1.11 are attached.
> > >
> > > Thanks for review!
> >
> > It would be nice to explain in the commit message why you used TRACE_LIBS
> > for the messages and not i.e OP_FAILURE.
> >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 14:29 +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > please see attached patch.
> > > >
> > > > This patch was previously written for BZ 1059423. But it now seems
that
> > > > more detailed logging information is generally useful for issues
that
> > > > are emerging from this area lately.
> > > >
> > > > Pavel Reichl
> > >
> > >
> >
> > > From e7e4a06098bce4df600370274babe470b0d71c47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Pavel Reichl <reichl.pavel(a)gmail.com>
> > > Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:27:23 +0100
> > > Subject: [PATCH] SDAP: augmented logging when adding new group
> > >
> > > Resolves:
> > >
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2239
> > > ---
> > > src/db/sysdb_ops.c | 92
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_groups.c | 2 +-
> > > 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/db/sysdb_ops.c b/src/db/sysdb_ops.c
> > > index
95354d98806a13cf142705dc304b7810b8ee82f4..559f8b51813fa499ec21d9e78189910cacc7b32a 100644
> > > --- a/src/db/sysdb_ops.c
> > > +++ b/src/db/sysdb_ops.c
> > > @@ -1428,7 +1428,15 @@ int sysdb_add_group(struct sysdb_ctx *sysdb,
> > > ret = sysdb_search_user_by_name(tmp_ctx, sysdb, domain,
> > > name, NULL, &msg);
> > > if (ret != ENOENT) {
> > > - if (ret == EOK) ret = EEXIST;
> > > + if (ret == EOK) {
> > > + DEBUG(SSSDBG_TRACE_LIBS, ("MPG domain is having a
user "
> >
> > "...domain contains..."
> >
> > > + "with the same name -
%s.\n", name));
> > > + ret = EEXIST;
> > > + } else {
> > > + DEBUG(SSSDBG_TRACE_LIBS,
> > > + ("sysdb_search_user_by_name failed for user
%s.\n",
> > > + name));
> > > + }
> > > goto done;
> > > }
> > > }
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > goto done;
> > > }
> > > DEBUG(SSSDBG_MINOR_FAILURE,
> > > ("A group with the same GID [%llu] was removed
from the "
> > > "cache\n", (unsigned long long) gid));
> >
> > If you're touching the code anyway, can you change the DEBUG calls to
> > use SPRIgid here as well?
> >
> > > +
> > > ret = sysdb_add_group(sysdb, domain, name, gid,
> > > attrs, cache_timeout, now);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + DEBUG(SSSDBG_MINOR_FAILURE,
> > > + ("sysdb_add_group failed (while renaming
group) for: "
> > > + "%s [%"SPRIgid"].\n", name,
gid));
> > > + }
> > > }
> > > goto done;
> > > }
> > _______________________________________________
> > sssd-devel mailing list
> > sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> >
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
>
> Hello Jakub,
>
> sorry for late reply. I attached patch addressing your concerns with
> previous version. If it desired I'll prepare patch for SSSD 1.11 when
> version for master is ACKed (to save me from the fun of rebasing this
> patch multiple times).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pavel Reichl
>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Hi,
I think we forgot to push this patch to master. It still applies.
Thanks,
PR
Yes, I forgot, sorry about that. I pushed it to master now:
4d69eef4713fac8ade73739dd72f949da51382f4