On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 09:00:56AM +0100, Stef Walter wrote:
On 14.01.2014 21:19, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 21:08 +0100, Stef Walter wrote:
>> However, if you want we can use the C99 struct initialization by name
>> feature here. Are we fine with using that?
> Yes we are fine with C99, and I strongly prefer initialization by name
> where it makes sense. For autogenerated code it makes a lot of sense.
Here's the updated patchset with the C99 struct initialization change.
As discussed with Stef on Monday in Brno, the SSSD team will rebase the
patches atop the DEBUG macro changes and will make sure parallel build
works fine with the generated code.