On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 10:48 +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 10/04/2012 04:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 13:03 +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> From 7c49fe46a3fbce1433ad1680a2e12335542706ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?= <pbrezina(a)redhat.com>
>> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:42:59 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] do not check for POLLERR, POLLHUP, POLLNVAL when
>> According to the poll manpage, those error are valid only for
>> output only.
> Ah btw I wanted to ask what you mean with this comment in the commit
> When 'reading' the flags after the poll returns we are in the
> situation, but from the way you wrote the comment to me it reads like
> you mention 'output' as meaning 'write event' (ie POLLOUT) ?
Oh, ignore anything I wrote before please. I completely misunderstood
I'm sending new patch. It special cases POLLHUP. If it occurs, we will
read the pipe and then close fd on the client side.
Looks good to me now.
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York