Guys,
This is great, thank you for finding it.
But this will really mess up my merges.
Can it be undone?
Also I have a ticket open to explicitly return to this part of code and
sort things out with valgrind.
Thanks for finding the answer and cause of the problem, it will make the
fixes simple
but would it possible next time to ask me first or at least wait for my
comment
or ack before pushing?
I have not fell off the planet at least yet...
Thanks
Dmitri
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 09/16/2009 11:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/16/2009 11:52 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On 09/16/2009 05:35 PM, Martin Nagy wrote:
>>> Obviously, valgrind was producing warnings precisely because of
the bug
>>> that Jakub's patch fixes. Therefore it was right to complain. I think
>>> the right thing to do right now is to remove all the explicit
>>> initializations and the comment about valgrind complaints.
>> That is absolutely correct, I even verified this with valgrind. New
>> patch attached.
>> Jakub
> Ack
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Pushed to master.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
--
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal
Engineering Manager IPA project,
Red Hat Inc.
-------------------------------
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/