-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2010 12:34 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 09/10/2010 05:40 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On 09/10/2010 11:16 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>>>> rebased versions attached.
>>>>>
>>>>> bye,
>>>>> Sumit
>>>
>>> Ack to both patches, but may I suggest that the attached patch be
>>> squashed in? Perhaps it would make for a little more readable code.
> yes, please do, ACK to both changes.
> bye,
> Sumit
Attaching both patches, the first one contains my squashed mini-patch
acked by Sumit.
Pushed both patches to master.
Patch 0002 needed to be rebased (again) because of the async bind patch
being reverted. However, the patch from earlier in this thread applied
cleanly now :)
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkyQ7zoACgkQeiVVYja6o6NCDACdG3YNKK4zgV7+Yvou8vY43tYq
wgcAn14XIuGhYe+cWYsiBJV5V6Yzq0h0
=CnhD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----