On (15/01/16 15:06), Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 02:26:48PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (15/01/16 10:21), Pavel Březina wrote:
> >On 01/14/2016 06:37 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:55:39PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>>On 01/13/2016 05:12 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>@@ -1018,7 +1019,6 @@ rules_iterator(hash_entry_t *item,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (ctx == NULL) {
> >>>>> DEBUG(SSSDBG_CRIT_FAILURE, "Bug: ctx is
NULL\n");
> >>>>>- ctx->ret = ERR_INTERNAL;
> >>>>> return false;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>>@@ -1066,7 +1066,6 @@ cmdgroups_iterator(hash_entry_t *item,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (ctx == NULL) {
> >>>>> DEBUG(SSSDBG_CRIT_FAILURE, "Bug: ctx is
NULL\n");
> >>>>>- ctx->ret = ERR_INTERNAL;
> >>>>> return false;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>it looks like the last 2 hunks are not available in the latest tar
ball.
> >>>
> >>>Sorry about that. Added.
> >>>
> >>>>and there are some trailing whitespaces in patch 9 at line 41.
> >>>
> >>>Fixed by git.
> >>>
> >>>I also attached two more patches then converts usn into number and then
use
> >>>in filter entryUSN >= (current + 1) instead of (entryUSN >= cur)
&&
> >>>(entryUSN != cur) as per Thierry request.
> >>>
> >>>It could probably be squashed and replace some previous patches but I
think
> >>>sending it as new patches is easier for you to review, given the
previous
> >>>patches are basically acked.
> >>
> >>>+ errno = 0;
> >>> usn_number = strtoul(usn, &endptr, 10);
> >>>- if ((endptr == NULL || (*endptr == '\0' && endptr !=
usn))
> >>>- && (usn_number > srv_opts->last_usn)) {
> >>>- srv_opts->last_usn = usn_number;
> >>>+ if (endptr != NULL && *endptr != '\0') {
> >>
> >>Currently an empty string in usn would result in usn_number==0, I wonder
> >>if this is valid or if it would be better to error out in this case?
> >
> >Zero value will not change anything since we always compare if the current
> >usn value is lower than the new one, we switch them only in such case. So I
> >think it is not necessary to error out in this case since strtoul succeeds.
> >
> >>
> >>Otherwise all looks good, CI and Coverity test are currently running.
> >>
> >>bye,
> >>Sumit
> >>
> >>>+ DEBUG(SSSDBG_MINOR_FAILURE, "Unable to convert USN
%s\n", usn);
> >>>+ return;
> >>>+ } else if (errno != 0) {
> >>>+ ret = errno;
> >>>+ DEBUG(SSSDBG_MINOR_FAILURE, "Unable to convert USN %s
[%d]:
> >>>%s\n",
> >>>+ usn, ret, sss_strerror(ret));
> >>>+ return;
> >>> }
>
> There are 4 failed test from freeipa sudo test suite.
>
> test-integration-test-sudo-TestSudo-test-sudo-rule-restricted-to-one-hostmask
>
test-integration-test-sudo-TestSudo-test-sudo-rule-restricted-to-running-as-single-local-user
>
test-integration-test-sudo-TestSudo-test-sudo-rule-restricted-to-run-as-users-from-local-group
>
test-integration-test-sudo-TestSudo-test-sudo-rule-restricted-to-running-as-single-local-group
>
>
> =================================== FAILURES ===================================
> ______________ TestSudo.test_sudo_rule_restricted_to_one_hostmask ______________
>
> self = <ipatests.test_integration.test_sudo.TestSudo object at 0x7fe0d7ace8d0>
>
> def test_sudo_rule_restricted_to_one_hostmask(self):
> if self.__class__.skip_hostmask_based:
> raise pytest.skip("Hostmask could not be detected")
>
> result1 = self.list_sudo_commands("testuser1")
> > assert "(ALL : ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL" in result1.stdout_text
> E assert '(ALL : ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL' in ''
> E + where '' = <pytest_multihost.transport.SSHCommand object at
0x7fe0d7acee10>.stdout_text
>
> test_integration/test_sudo.py:295: AssertionError
> ______ TestSudo.test_sudo_rule_restricted_to_running_as_single_local_user ______
>
> self = <ipatests.test_integration.test_sudo.TestSudo object at 0x7fe0d79de990>
>
> def test_sudo_rule_restricted_to_running_as_single_local_user(self):
> result1 = self.list_sudo_commands("testuser1", verbose=True)
> > assert "RunAsUsers: localuser" in result1.stdout_text
There are just too many options. I tested RunAsUsers and RunAsUsers
but only with IPA users and groups. I looks like the handling for the
ipasudorunasextuser and ipasudorunasextgroup attributes are missing.
That's the purpose of automated tests :-)
To cover all use-case.
Furtunatelly, Tomas wrote quite good test.
But there still might be other use cases which are not covered.
Because we cannot see a code coverage :-(
LS