On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:11 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:34:10AM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 21:19 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 07:27:28PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 18:13 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:22:04PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I noticed these two warnings in clang.
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be great if the 2nd patch could be checked by Sumit to
make
> > > > > sure that the return value wasn't ignored on purpose.
> > > >
> > > > yes, I would prefer to ignore errors here. There might be various
cases
> > > > were we are not able to resolve a single SID but still can proceed
with
> > > > the others.
> > >
> > > Please see attached patch. Feel free to NACK it, if you think it's
more
> > > pain than gain.
> >
> > Why not do something useful to avoid the compiler warning and print a
> > SSSDBG_TRACE_ALL debug message with the returned error code in the case
> > of an error?
>
> Hello Sumit,
>
> I just took your previous response too literally - "I would prefer to
> ignore errors here" - my bad. (Hopefully final) patch attached.
Thank you. ACK
I wonder if the explicit (unsigned int) casts are needed to avoid
warnings or if you are just calling them to be on the safe side?
Honestly, I just copy&past them. When I removed them I didn't notice any
relevant clang or gcc warnings. I asked Jakub and he advised me that I
could have used formatting macros PRIu16 and PRIu32.
I would suggest to leave patch as is for now.
Pavel Reichl
bye,
Sumit
>
> Pavel Reichl
> From eb7bff126d870b2484bcfccf1983a00783985c0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pavel Reichl <preichl(a)redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:00:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PAC: fix clang warning
>
> Return value of sss_dp_get_account_recv is checked and logging is done accordingly.
> ---
> src/responder/pac/pacsrv_cmd.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/responder/pac/pacsrv_cmd.c b/src/responder/pac/pacsrv_cmd.c
> index
00cdf608bef2be1543a15cee4ae02c78c3bc9f8e..cf631ff360728a1be21f7cec4128b4d57e0d3a08 100644
> --- a/src/responder/pac/pacsrv_cmd.c
> +++ b/src/responder/pac/pacsrv_cmd.c
> @@ -1094,6 +1094,14 @@ static void pac_lookup_sids_next_done(struct tevent_req
*subreq)
> ret = sss_dp_get_account_recv(req, subreq,
> &err_maj, &err_min,
> &err_msg);
> + if (ret != EOK) {
> + DEBUG(SSSDBG_OP_FAILURE,
> + "Unable to get information from Data Provider\n"
> + "dp_error: [%u], errno: [%u], error_msg: [%s]\n",
> + (unsigned int)err_maj, (unsigned int)err_min,
> + err_msg ? err_msg : "none");
> + }
> +
> talloc_zfree(subreq);
> talloc_zfree(err_msg);
> /* Errors during individual lookups are ignored. */
> --
> 1.8.4.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel