On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (19/06/15 14:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> We have 19 patches in 1.11 branch on top of latest release (1.11.7)
>> I went through bugs filed against 1.11 branch and filter
>> crashes and the most important bugs.
>> Attached are cherrry-picked patches from 1.12/master
>> So we can release the latest 1.11 version. It will be just a bug-fix release.
>> So some conservative distribution can use it or in another words.
>> we don't want have 1.11 branch neither in unreleased not in unclosed state
>> BTW I test packages with LDAP KRB5 and AD test. Of course there are any
>> regressions because it is a bug fix only release.
>I applied the patches and built the SRPM:
>It worked, so ACK..
>Do you want to push the patches and release the tarball?
Here is an updated patch set.
I tested it with ldap, krb5, proxy and ad provider.
and there were no failure. Except of missing features :-)
But I wanted to backport only crashes and bug-fixes.
If we do not want to include patch with negroup leak
then we can release latest 1.11 version.
I would like to include the netgroups fix and also 52e3ee5c5ff2c5a per
Timo's request on IRC.
I looked at the patches' description and the list looks OK to me. I
didn't look at the code at all to be honest, did you have to change a
lot of patches so that they apply?
Howard, does Suse carry any patches atop 1.11.x that you would like us
to include so that you don't have to keep them?