Title: #165: selinux: Do not fail if SELinux is not managed
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (23/02/17 00:40), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:20:08AM -0800, mzidek-rh wrote:
> Previously we failed if selinux_is_managed returned
> 0 or -1 (not managed or error). With this patch we
> only fail in case of error and continue normally if
> selinux is not managed by libsemanage at all.
>
> Resolves:
>
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3297
> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
>
>
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/165
So far I only scrolled through the diff, but it looks OK. Did you try
building the package for @adelton to see if it fixes the issue he was
seeing?
Firstly we need to ensure that we do not break selinux integration.
Then we can check use case with disabled SELinux.
LS
"""
See the full comment at